I would hope the House would have Shokin testify before the appropriate committee. He only enforces what Biden has admitted to doing. Time to start the impeachment inquiry.
I agree. Too many pieces are suggesting what we all intuitively know.
The fact of the payoff is indisputable.
It’s a question of “mens rea.”
Was the transaction a legitimate, sanctioned act of foreign policy, or did it involve criminal intent on Biden’s part?
You are right, Jaycee. But it must also be viewed in the context of all the other transactions in multiple countries, the e-mail evidence, the calls, and the multiple people willing to testify about these matters…
I would hope the House would have Shokin testify before the appropriate committee. He only enforces what Biden has admitted to doing. Time to start the impeachment inquiry.
I agree. Too many pieces are suggesting what we all intuitively know.
The fact of the payoff is indisputable.
It’s a question of “mens rea.”
Was the transaction a legitimate, sanctioned act of foreign policy, or did it involve criminal intent on Biden’s part?
You are right, Jaycee. But it must also be viewed in the context of all the other transactions in multiple countries, the e-mail evidence, the calls, and the multiple people willing to testify about these matters…