2 thoughts on “One Socialist Method of Election Fraud (Among Many)”
Several years ago I wrote a letter to the editor ( which was published ) that touched on this scheme:
News & Record
9-18-97
Letter to the editor
GORE’S BIG QUESTION: IS HE A
MAN OR A TREE?
Your fragile apologia for the sleazy, illegal, no restraint fund-raising of Al
Gore was, of course, predictable and disgustingly kind. (“The system
victimizes a respectable politician,’ Sept. 9).
   Gore is a dangerous environmental extremist. He favors expansion of
government. He is a hypocrite regarding tobacco. His book damns the automobile
as a “moral threat.’ Now he degrades the high office he holds.
   Gore got caught dialing for dollars. His “no controlling legal authority’
press conference was laughable. First he claimed that “on a few occasions’ he
made fund-raising calls from the White House for “soft money.’ Upon closer
examination, “a few’ turned out to be 46. Then it was disclosed by The
Washington Post that he knew, or should have known, that some of the bucks he
extorted were to be used by the Clinton-Gore election effort. Hello, Janet
Reno. The press asked the questions, dug up the answers and viola…the
attorney general finally triggered the long overdue process to name an
independent counsel to investigate this sordid mess.The editorial’s attempt to
excuse Gore’s felonies by blaming reckless staff work is so much guano. First,
they called the April 1996 Buddhist Temple affair, “community outreach.’ You
ignore the fact that Gore’s own e-mail refers to the upcoming event as a fund
raiser. I guess the devil made him do it. Betcha can’t wait to endorse Gore for
president in 2000, that is if you are able to determine…is he a man or a
tree?Â
Fred H. Gregory
Greensboro
Â
It seems some things never change, Fred. It was so obvious Gore was obfuscating…
Several years ago I wrote a letter to the editor ( which was published ) that touched on this scheme:
News & Record
9-18-97
Letter to the editor
GORE’S BIG QUESTION: IS HE A
MAN OR A TREE?
Your fragile apologia for the sleazy, illegal, no restraint fund-raising of Al
Gore was, of course, predictable and disgustingly kind. (“The system
victimizes a respectable politician,’ Sept. 9).
   Gore is a dangerous environmental extremist. He favors expansion of
government. He is a hypocrite regarding tobacco. His book damns the automobile
as a “moral threat.’ Now he degrades the high office he holds.
   Gore got caught dialing for dollars. His “no controlling legal authority’
press conference was laughable. First he claimed that “on a few occasions’ he
made fund-raising calls from the White House for “soft money.’ Upon closer
examination, “a few’ turned out to be 46. Then it was disclosed by The
Washington Post that he knew, or should have known, that some of the bucks he
extorted were to be used by the Clinton-Gore election effort. Hello, Janet
Reno. The press asked the questions, dug up the answers and viola…the
attorney general finally triggered the long overdue process to name an
independent counsel to investigate this sordid mess.The editorial’s attempt to
excuse Gore’s felonies by blaming reckless staff work is so much guano. First,
they called the April 1996 Buddhist Temple affair, “community outreach.’ You
ignore the fact that Gore’s own e-mail refers to the upcoming event as a fund
raiser. I guess the devil made him do it. Betcha can’t wait to endorse Gore for
president in 2000, that is if you are able to determine…is he a man or a
tree?Â
Fred H. Gregory
Greensboro
Â
It seems some things never change, Fred. It was so obvious Gore was obfuscating…